Optimism and interventional cardiology.
نویسنده
چکیده
One day, a decade ago, I was trying to place a coronary stent. It wasn’t going well. I grumbled to Tammy, the cath technologist assisting me, that it looked like we were going to fail. Tammy looked me straight in the eye and said, “Dr. Blankenship, you really are a pessimistic person.” After the case ended successfully, her comment lingered. That night, somewhat defensively, I asked my wife, “I’m not a pessimistic person, am I?” She answered without hesitation: “Yes, you are.” Somewhere I had read that optimism is a choice. I swore at that moment to choose optimism. But that isn’t easy. We face pessimism every day. A 2013 survey by the Doctors Company found that 89% of physician respondents would not recommend a career in medicine to their children [1]. A 2014 Medscape survey found that only 44% of cardiologist responders are satisfied with their income, 39% would not choose a career in medicine again, and 41% would not choose cardiology as a specialty again [2]. Cardiac catheterizations and coronary interventions have decreased by 30% in the past decade, and it often seems that surgeons, payers and the media all think they should decrease further. The majority of cardiologists are now employed, and many mourn their lack of independence and chafe under the bit of hospital administrators. All of these factors might make us pessimistic. Yet I argue for optimism, for 3 reasons. First, opportunities abound in interventional cardiology. Second, optimism often proves to be right. Finally, optimism is good for you. OPPORTUNITIES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of Maximum Patient Skin Dose Arising from Interventional Cardiology Using Thermoluminescence Dosimeter in Mashhad, Iran
Introduction The increasing practice of interventional fluoroscopy in diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease has risen attention to improve radiation protection of patients and cardiologists in these relatively high dose techniques. Therefore, nowadays there is an emphasis on the measurement of radiation dose received by patients and cardiologists arising from the relevant procedures...
متن کاملAre Radiation Exposure Levels Used in Cardiology Dangerous?
Background: The number of interventional cardiology procedures performed has increased rapidly over the past years. While these procedures help physicians avoid using highly complicated invasive methods, it usually leads to high levels of exposure to ionizing radiation of both patients and cardiologist. The dose received by the cardiologist during interventional cardiology procedures is determi...
متن کاملStaff dose assessment from coronary angiography
Background: Interventional cardiology procedures such as coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA) has been increased recent years. The purpose of this study was to measurement of effective dose to cardiology staffs who operate near the patient and are exposed to non-uniform radiation field due to patient scattered radiation. Materials and Methods: This...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
دوره 86 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015